Should I self-publish or traditionally publish my memoir?
- Anemari Jansen
- Jul 30
- 3 min read

“Should I self-publish or traditionally publish? Which is the better publishing option right now?”
I FOUND A VERY INSIGHTFUL ARTICLE ABOUT THIS CONONDRUM
“The problem with this question is the answer can be very complex. There are so many different factors that could possibly come into play, and the answers are not always cut and dry.
But…it’s only complicated for about 2% of authors.
For 97% of authors, the answer is very clear: self-publishing is the right choice.
For the other 1% of authors, the answer is very clear in the other direction: traditional publishing is the better choice.
This post is for that 98% of authors who should clearly go one way or the other and is designed to help you easily and quickly understand which side you are on.”
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SELF-PUBLISHING AND TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING?
There is only ONE key difference:
If the author owns the rights and royalties, then the book is self-published.
If the publishing company owns the rights and royalties, then the book is traditionally published.
That is it.
WHO SHOULD TRADITIONALLY PUBLISH?
First off, it’s really hard to get an offer to publish through traditional publishers.
But if you can get an offer, you should (almost certainly) take the deal.
These are mainly the types of people who can get those deals:
Big celebrities
Famous athletes
A-list actors
Politicians
Household name CEOs
Professional writers (novelists, etc.) with a history of high sales
People with deep connections in the publishing industry
WHO SHOULD SELF-PUBLISH?
Just about everyone else:
Consultants
Entrepreneurs
· Businesspeople
Lawyers
Doctors
Coaches
First-time authors
Anyone else who just wants to write their book
WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES?
Advantages | Disadvantages |
Self-published authors have full ownership of rights and royalties | You must make sure the book is good in all aspects. If it’s unprofessional in any way (writing, cover, marketing, etc.), it will make you look bad. |
Completely customisable in all aspects | It’s time consuming to learn and manage the process yourself. |
Fast to market (6 months) | If you hire excellent professionals to help you, it’s expensive. |
Complete control of marketing | There’s either a lot of work, or a lot of money, to get it right. |
Complete creative control | |
Complete freedom, no gatekeepers telling you what you can and cannot do | |
Self-published books have a significantly higher profit potential | |
Can do niche books (which are a huge advantage for most authors) |
Traditional Publishing
Advantages | Disadvantages |
Monetary advance prior to publishing (no up-front cost) | Nearly impossible to get a deal (less than 1 percent of proposals are accepted) |
Publisher invests the money to publish the book (and they usually can ensure professionalism) | Huge time investment (the traditional publishing process is overly complex) |
Highest potential for traditional media coverage | Very slow to market (2+ years) |
Highest chance of print distribution in bookstores | No ownership of your manuscript rights |
Sends signal of validation (to some people) | No marketing control |
No creative control | |
Limited financial upside | |
Won’t do niche books |
SELF PUBLISHING VERSUS TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING
First answer this question: Can you get a traditional publishing deal?
If you can get a deal, go to the next question.
If not, then self-publish.
If you’re unsure whether you can get a deal or not – this is important: To traditionally publish you must have an audience of a few thousand people waiting to buy your book specifically.
IF YOU CAN GET A TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING DEAL, SHOULD YOU TAKE IT?
If the answer is status, go traditional.If the answer is validation, go traditional.If the answer is quick money, go traditional.If the answer is long-term wealth, self-publish.If the answer is freedom, self-publish.If the answer is creativity, self-publish.If the answer is making an impact, self-publish.
Conclusion: Self-publishing is probably the right answer (97+% of the time)
Like almost all things in life, when you take out the weird fringe exceptions, it becomes clear and easy to understand.
97% of authors should clearly self-publish.
1% of authors should traditionally publish.
The other 2% should take a lot of time and effort and do the research so they can make a hard decision.”
CONTACT ME FOR A FREE DISCUSSION OF YOUR MANUSCRIPT
Let’s talk and have a look at your manuscript – as an author coach and publisher I would love to help you!




Comments